Skip to main content

This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

0855

reference
845-tree-1
name
0855
tree-preservation-order

undefined

845-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.048067 50.858369)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.048010 50.858363,-1.048012 50.858375,-1.048020 50.858385,-1.048033 50.858393,-1.048048 50.858398,-1.048066 50.858400,-1.048083 50.858398,-1.048099 50.858393,-1.048112 50.858385,-1.048120 50.858375,-1.048123 50.858364,-1.048121 50.858353,-1.048113 50.858343,-1.048101 50.858335,-1.048085 50.858330,-1.048067 50.858328,-1.048050 50.858330,-1.048034 50.858334,-1.048021 50.858342,-1.048013 50.858352,-1.048010 50.858363)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL